The Flyer Blog

Which newspaper (if any) should the City advertise with?

January 18, 2009 12:10 pm · By Todd Gill · 8 Comments

Last week at the City Council Agenda Session, the issue of which local newspaper to publish 2009 public notices in almost got skimmed right over. That is, until Ward 3 Alderman Bobby Ferrell spoke up.

“Is this a bid?” he asked, upon realizing that the proposed advertising contract with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette was for a whopping $102,225. The answer was “no.”

What exactly does that mean? It means that once again, the City Council is being asked to approve an advertising budget with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette without considering the possibility of using another local newspaper that might (or might not) save some money.

The city contract for public notice advertising has long since belonged to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. Although the question of whether or not to switch to The Morning News has come up twice before, the decision has always been to stay the course.

Public notices such as city ordinances, bond issues, bid advertisements, etc. are required by code to be advertised in a newspaper that is “published” in Fayetteville. Of course, “published” is the key word here. What does that even mean?

Neither newspaper is printed in Fayetteville, so are we to assume that “published” must mean “prepared” in this instance? If so, things are still foggy considering both have offices in Fayetteville that “prepare” Fayetteville-specific news to be “published” in a regional-specific newspaper.

So now what? How does the City Council decide which paper to spend money with? The editors at the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette’s Northwest Arkansas Times think it’s an easy decision.

“In Fayetteville, the local paper (that’s us) goes to many thousands more reader households than our Springdale competitor does,” read yesterday’s Times Editorial.

Although it’s no surprise to us that the Democrat-Gazette would be in favor of itself, it’s silly to pretend that either newspaper is more local than the other. The Morning News produces a Fayetteville edition and the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette has its Northwest Arkansas Times insert but ask anyone around here what the local newspaper is and you’ll certainly get a confusing answer.

If circulation is the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette’s position, then just leave it at that. There’s certainly a good argument that reaching more of the public is key. But getting all technical about where each paper is “based” will only lead to one conclusion: Both papers are “based” 200 miles south of here, in Little Rock.

With newspapers across the country falling apart left and right, to us, the bigger issue here is whether or not the City should be considering a newspaper at all.

Or better yet, if the state legislature isn’t quite ready to allow public notices to be displayed on these fancy new internets thingies, should the newspapers even be charging the City to provide vital public information in the first place?

It will be up to the City Council, once again, to decide all of this. Which direction do you think they should go on Tuesday evening?

[Update: More at The Iconoclast.]

  • Print
  • PDF
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • MySpace
  • RSS

Comments

The Fayetteville Flyer doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

Sus
January 19, 2009

since you get 90 percent of your information for this site from the local newspapers, it seems you should want to support them, not make them go away.

Todd Gill
January 19, 2009

@Sus: As we’ve stated time and time again, we do not want the newspapers to go away. Without them, who will deliver the news? This article is not about supporting or not supporting the newspapers. It’s about which paper (if any) the City should post public notices in. And I hate to be nit-picky but nowadays, we get about 90 percent of the information for this website from tips, press releases and our own experiences as citizens of Fayetteville. In fact, out of the 44 posts that appear on our front page, only 6 of them are responses based on information we read in a local newspaper.

Sus
January 19, 2009

If the city were to stop advertising in the local papers, I assure you they would struggle to stay afloat, even more so then they are doing now. They need that ad revenue in order to pay the reporters that deliver the news that the Iconoclast bloggers post about every day. And I’ve yet to see any Fayetteville Flyer reporters at City Council meetings, but I am glad to see that you are getting your info from other sources.

Todd Gill
January 19, 2009

@Sus: You’re right. Newspapers definitely need ad revenue and lots of it. But I don’t think the City’s annual contract will make-or-break either newspaper. As for the City Council meetings, fortunately, they are televised.

George
January 19, 2009

The issue here is that this is tax payer money. I want to see the newspapers survive as much (probably more) than the next guy, but it shouldn’t be propped up by tax money. If there is a cheaper, viable alternative it should be entertained.

@Sus – If the paper really needs this revenue to stay afloat, this is a serious problem. How can they possibly cover local news without bias if they depend on the support of our local officials to stay in business?

dduzie
January 23, 2009

The Times. Their “local” section is Fayetteville news.

Morning News covers Fayetteville as an afterthought

Beebs
January 29, 2009

I know this conversation is over now but I think you all will get a kick out of this. Be sure to watch it to the end. The last thing she says is great.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WCTn4FljUQ

Trackbacks

Post a Comment

We love comments but please be civil, OK? No ad hominem attacks, vulgarity, slander, libel, etc. Read our full policy.

Want a photo next to your name? Just sign up for a free Gravatar account and use that e-mail address when commenting.