Fayetteville Forward: Q&A with Don Marr

March 23, 2009 7:00 am · By Dustin · 10 Comments

Last week, we mentioned the Fayetteville Forward Summit in a post about free WiFi in Fayetteville. A lot of you had some pretty strong opinions about that subject. Next week, you’ll have the opportunity to make your voices heard on that and other issues facing Fayetteville during the first ever Fayetteville Forward Summit.

It begins March 31st and the goal is to create an economic development plan along with a timeline for implementation including action items to improve the city of Fayetteville.

All Fayetteville residents are encouraged to participate in the process and will have the option to choose from one of three dates for the first half of the summit entitled “Discover and Dream.” The second session, “Design and Deploy,” is an all-day affair from 8am to 5pm on April 4th and will focus on taking the information gathered from the first session and figuring out how to turn ideas into reality.

We got in touch with Mayor Lioneld Jordan’s Chief of Staff, Don Marr, and he was nice enough to elaborate on what exactly Fayetteville Forward is, and what the city hopes to accomplish with it.

Fayetteville Flyer: The ultimate goal of the Fayetteville Forward summit is to create an economic development plan for Fayetteville. How will this be achieved (IE, who will moderate, who will be responsible for compiling the data gathered, and creating and implementing the finalized plan?)
Don Marr: The summit will use Appreciative Inquiry as the methodology. Bliss Browne, founder of Imagine Chicago, will facilitate. I would recommend visiting the Imagine Chicago website to see Bliss’ resume and the many accolades and honors they have received.

City staff will assist with summit logistics and will help to capture and disseminate summit results. Outcomes of the summit include a compelling vision for the future and the start of some collaborative partnerships to work on discreet initiatives that will help to drive economic development. The city does not “DO” economic development. The city can create favorable conditions for development, but more importantly can help to bring various stakeholder groups together to work collaboratively toward mutually beneficial results that no single entity can accomplish alone.

FF: What other goals do you have for the summit?
DM: As stated above, we would like to foster partnerships between multiple stakeholder groups, identify actions steps necessary to foster this climate of economic growth, gain consensus on direction, and make sure that the City has specific action plans, target dates, and owners, of those items that belong to the City of Fayetteville and the Mayor.

FF: There are two phases of the summit that take place in two one-day sessions. Can you give us an idea of what kinds of things can citizens expect from the first day?
Day 1: Discover and Dream – citizens will work in small groups to articulate Fayetteville’s strengths; those things we want to preserve and bring into the future. It is about identifying strengths that we can leverage to create the future. It is very positive.

Dream is about brainstorming together and engaging is a “what if” exercise. What would be a radical vision for the future? What would excite and engage people? What is the best possible future we can imagine?

FF: And what about the Saturday session? What kinds of things will happen there?
DM: Saturday is about Design and Deploy; we take the strengths and dreams and begin to think about how to make them happen. What do we need to create? Who are the stakeholders and partners who can get it done? We will identify initiatives that we can undertake to move forward. Each initiative will have a goals; owners identified and time lines.

The summit is the start of a process. AFTER the summit the real work begins. Each owner of a goal will write its own plan with action steps and milestones and time lines to accomplish that goal. This happens after the summit.

FF: According to Wikipedia, there are 67,000 some-odd people in Fayetteville. I doubt they all will attend the summit, but I’ll bet there will be a pretty wide range of personalities and opinions that will need to be represented in the plan. How can you take all these differing ideas, and make them into a plan that is best for Fayetteville?
DM: That is the beauty of Appreciative Inquiry. The methodology is uniquely suited to helping people of very different perspectives and points of view find common ground from which to work together in mutually beneficial ways. We have more in common than we have things that separate us. If AI can be used to bring an entire industry together to reduce its carbon footprint, then it can help us work together to improve the city we all call home

FF: One of the things that Mayor Jordan said would be discussed in the summit was the possibility of free WiFi in Fayetteville. What are some of the economic benefits of citywide free WiFi?
DM: So much information is available today on the internet and websites. Mayor Jordan believes that the primary thing that propels people to succeed is education, and providing as much access as possible for people to obtain information, research, and educate themselves only improves the lives of everyone involved. Not to mention this makes us more attractive to prospective employees, particularly the next generation of employees.

FF: What are some of the drawbacks or limitations?
DM: The main drawback we see is having our community focus on our differences in the past rather than where we have agreement, and how to use the positives of our community going forward. We must act, we can’t just keep talking about it. This summit is focused on actions and we must come out of this summit with clear objectives and owners.

FF: What are some other ideas that will be discussed?
DM: We hope that we will talk about keeping the businesses we have and supporting new entrepreneurial efforts. We hope we will talk about bringing/recruiting new companies. We hope we will talk about training people for the green jobs of the future. We hope that we will talk about freeing up encumbered wealth. We hope that sustainability is an important theme – we can’t attract the sustainability jobs of the future if we don’t do sustainability ourselves. We have to walk the talk. We have to focus on the triple bottom line – people, planet, and profit. The environment and economics are not mutually exclusive goals – either/or – they are both.

Other areas that we would like to obtain feedback on are as follows:

  • What economic development tools do you believe are needed to promote Fayetteville and NW Arkansas to prospective Company Employers?
  • What pieces of information, and what promotional material do you believe is needed to promote Fayetteville and NW Arkansas to prospective Employees/Workforce?
  • What ideas do you have for Economic Development Incentives, and what protection as fellow citizens do you want to see in place when offering such incentives?
  • Economic Development opportunities are often kept quiet and confidential and prospective companies will often forgo opportunities if they become too public too early. With guiding principles should be in place while the prospect phase is taking place, and when and how should the public be involved in the process?
  • What do you think are the 5 most important actions that the City of Fayetteville needs to take to be more effective in Economic Development activities?

FF: How will the findings from the Eva Klein study, the 2025 plan, and other studies be integrated into the summit?
DM: Basically, the summit can be a way for us to connect the dots between the studies, to weave these efforts together into a comprehensive and cohesive whole. 2025 is about physical spaces and where things are located. It is not an economic development plan. It does help to create a sense of place and create a climate that fosters economic development. So it is important. But it is only a part of the solution. The Eva Klein study provides recommendations, that will set the stage for economic development.

With regard to the Eva Klein study, I quote: “an important objective for Phase I was the achievement of a reasonable degree of buy-in and commitment by the regional stakeholders to a common vision. (p. 1)” Our reaction to that is what vision? After reading the study, the information resembling a vision is on page 17, “be a healthy, beautiful, prosperous, and fun place.” That’s nice, but is that OUR vision?

It is stated on page 21, “with this deliverable, stakeholders may consider that the vision part of planning, comprised of six major strategy areas and six goal statements is completed and that the vision and goals may be adopted.” Our reaction to that is this is not a vision. There are 6 major strategy areas and 6 goal statements”. We don’t see in the list of participants, the health care community or religious organizations, or environmental NGO’s or social NGO’s. We don’t see neighborhood associations. We want to see more university participation.

Eva Klein did a Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats analysis. SWOT is not the same as vision.

Appreciative Inquiry is a different process. It is inclusive and brings a much broader group of stakeholders to the table. People will buy into what they have a hand in creating. They will get their friends and neighbors to buy-in as well. A truly inspiring vision will energize people and they will want to be involved and contribute to make it a reality.

One of the major things that struck us from the study is the comment that “Fayetteville is a city divided against itself.” Eva Klein recommended getting the people in the middle involved. But we think there is a better solution. Yes – get the middle to speak up, by all means; But get the two extremes to talk to each other also. The developer doesn’t want to destroy Fayetteville. They really just want to make money. The “no development” camp doesn’t want to live in a dying city with no jobs or economic future and they don’t want to live in an ugly city. How can we bring them together around a common vision? Is it better than a weak compromise or a delicate truce or drowning out their voices by getting the middle to speak louder. A compelling vision speaks to both groups, it resonates.

A major recommendation is to get the various stakeholders to work together, to collaborate regionally. I think we have to get our various stakeholders to work together LOCALLY first. We have been clear with our facilitator Bliss Brown, that this needs to be the focus of the summit. Create a vision, then start building collaborative partnerships to make that vision a reality.

So let’s talk about an example of one area. If the vision were to build a truly sustainable city, what will we have to do TOGETHER to make that happen?

Health is a major component of sustainability. What are the metrics for a healthy city? Who are the partners? WRMC for sure! Fayetteville schools are in! Nutrition is key, so get the community gardens folks on the team. What about the VA and UAMS? U of A, particularly the college of health and education. The city has a role to play in terms of trails, parks, and recreation. Business is a major stakeholder. What if their insurance premiums went down, productivity went up? Our citizens, particularly those at the bottom of the economic ladder, are key beneficiaries. They have a lot of wealth encumbered in health care expenses – prescriptions, doctors bills, chronic illnesses, and when they can’t go to work whether they are sick or a child or parent is sick, they lose wages, a double whammy. What would happen if they were healthier? Spent less on health related expenses? Had fewer lost wages due to sick days? What could they do with that extra money ? And health is the number one predictor of well-being and happiness.

So if that were the case, at the summit, a group of the above stakeholders would then start coming up with one or more initiatives that they could tackle. Maybe they decide to create health circles in the community. Maybe student interns from the U of A become personal trainers for circles and help them to stay motivated and on track. Maybe businesses start looking at their opportunities to promote health. Maybe we launch a city-wide effort to lose 60,000 lbs – just one lb for every man, woman and child. What if we celebrated people who hit their health goals? What if everyone was talking about health?

What does that have to do with economic development? What company wouldn’t want to come here and be a part of that? Happy healthy workforce, low insurance premiums, health related businesses – it goes on and on.

But health is only one vision. What if Fayetteville were a wireless city? Who would benefit? Who are the partners? What does the initiative look like? What are the goals and key steps to success?

The summit is intended to generate radical visions for the future and set in motion the collaborative partnerships to make those visions real. Key is follow up through communicating the vision and reporting results and outcomes. We must hold ourselves accountable.

FF: Ideally, who will participate in the Fayetteville Forward summit?
DM: Everyone! Teachers and students. Neighborhood association leaders. Non-profits like Sierra Club and Bicycle Coalition of the Ozarks. Business owners, the investment community, Labor/Workers. Members of the religious community. Artists. Youth leaders. You name it! Everyone is welcome. Everyone is needed. Everyone is important in this process. Given the challenges we face – economic, environmental, etc, we don’t know where the next best idea will come from. We can’t afford to limit participation and ideas.

FF: What else should the public know about Fayetteville Forward before attending the summit?
DM: It’s only giving up 1 day and 3 hours of your life for input into the future of your family, your children and our City. We want people to be involved in the process, and this is the plan that will drive the City’s staffing and financial resources over the next four years of Mayor Jordan’s term. If you don’t participate now, you are losing your chance to be a part of the plan. Go to www.accessfayetteville.org and register to participate TODAY!

For more info on the Fayetteville Forward summit, click here. To register, click here.

  • Print
  • PDF
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • MySpace
  • RSS

Comments

The Fayetteville Flyer doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

By Total Bastard on March 23rd, 2009

CYNIC ALERT:

I predict that the results of this summit will be a “vision” as nebulous as the results of the first half of the Eva Klein study. Consensus is simply not possible in a city of 70,000 people, except as a watered-down, generic, lowest-common denominator platitude.

When viewing Marr’s insistent criticism of the “incompleteness” of the data from the Klein study, one must bear in mind that the second part of the Klein study was never done, and the entire endeavor was criticized as having been wasteful by the people in charge now.

I wonder how much money is required to put on this 4 day event, including brining in outside moderators. Is it really going to be less expensive than the second half of the Eva Klein study would have been? I find that hard to believe. But, Coody hired Eva Klein, so its bad. Very BAAAAAAAD….

Will the results of this ambitiously titled forum be a focused vision of what the city needs to do to drive economic development in a way that improves this city?

I really think that a few people who are elected as leaders, i.e. the City Council, Mayor, and other city staff should craft a “vision” themselves, with feedback from residents as the residents desire to give it. Isn’t that part of what leadership is about? Why have elections if everything is going to be done by ballot and charrette? Inefficient.

This entire “we must include everyone” just seems so tiresome and unrealistic to me. Everyone has the chance to be included in Fayetteville. They have had this for decades. There is no shortage of citizen input in this city. There never has been. Yet we’re told again and again that the “people’s voice” isn’t being heard. I really don’t see how that can possibly be true. What is true is that the extremely vocal super-enviro-preservation minority isn’t happy with anything going on, and they are persistent in their protest.

This process, while idealistic, won’t yield any new results. We’ll still have a very vocal, anti-development faction which has proven itself unreasonable in its insistence to protest EVERY SINGLE DAMNED DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY, INCLUDING AWESOME NEW URBANIST PROJECTS LIKE RUSKIN HEIGHTS, and a business community that is treated unequally dependent on which ones of them are longtime Fayetteville residents or played football at the U of A.

Working folks with families and actual lives will not attend. Empty nesters and semi-employed hippies will attend, and so it won’t be any different than your typical city council or planning commission meeting.

I suppose Marr thinks that “everybody” will come to an agreement via this forum.

The result will be the same results we’ve had for years. The vocal anti development folks will drive the debate, and thusly, Marr and Jordan will have this “mandate” to drive their decisions for the remainder of their terms.

I will stop typing here to avoid the fat jokes that are itching to be typed by my cynical little fingers.

By a. brown on March 23rd, 2009

I wonder if there is any plan to get those working families to attend, such as community organizers going to South Fayetteville and getting the info out, organizing some transit. It really is the small things like reminders and a ride that get those busy people out. They’ve got more immediate things on their minds than the long-term future of the town (let’s be realistic: how many hours a day do we think about the “vision” rather than our jobs and families).

By Alannah on March 23rd, 2009

Working single mom here. I could maybe do one of the evening sessions but all day on a Saturday? When my weekend time is beyond precious? I’m sorry. I love this town like crazy…but, to quote Meatloaf, I won’t do that.

By Total Bastard on March 23rd, 2009

Here’s my vision:

Cleantech industries. Get it. Get it in south Fayetteville.

How? I don’t know. Thats not my job, nor is it the job of Joe Cool Hippie or Rita Recycler. Its the job of the people making 6 figures to run this city, and their overweight, former anonymous blogging, appointed lackeys.

Polluting industries and low wage high volume industries. Skip it. Don’t pursue it.

Ok.

Now what else do you city employees wasting tax dollars need to know?

Oh, if you’d like ideas on how to attract cleantech businesses, why don’t you network with other similar cities who have attracted similar industries, attend the mayors’ conferences, become connected with other civic leaders; collaborate, share ideas; and maybe consider outsourcing the recruitment to a consultant who specializes in that field?

Wait, thats what Coody was doing. It can’t be right. Lets ask the Llama Lady and some south Fayetteville hippie-billies what they think, instead.

I need a new bag of popcorn to watch this circus.

By Scott Stapp of Creed on March 23rd, 2009

Well whatever you do, make sure you don’t go the Fayetteville Forward Summmit and share those concerns with Mr. Marr. Probably best to eat popcorn and complain on the internet.

By Scott Stapp of Creed on March 23rd, 2009

Yes, three M’s. That’s how magnificent, marvelous, and monumental this Summmit is going to be.

By Total Bastard on March 24th, 2009

SCOTTY!

Marr doesn’t want to hear my concerns; my concerns being that this is a waste of time, and the least efficient way to go about developing an economic development “vision” for Fayetteville.

I’m just a bitter Coody supporter, wondering when my yard debris will be picked up, waiting on my free Wi-Fi to come down the landscaped boulevard to my affordable house.

By epuckett on March 25th, 2009

I don’t know how this civic experiment will turn out, but I am very excited that there is a deliberative/participative democracy initiative in Fayetteville. It’s a step forward in the right direction if the people working on it (Marr and Jordan) are willing and able to learn from this first trial run.

There are all sorts of criticisms about the process but it can also facilitate real action (eDemocracy.org and an extensive case study about Chicago’s experimentation with deliberative democracy: http://books.google.com/books?id=htiAzTjR-AAC&dq=empowered+participation+fung&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=konKSbSqMeLqnQe6v-WcAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result).

Other readings to peruse:

Francesca Polletta, Freedom is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements

John Gastil and Peter Levine, eds. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Citizen Engagement in the 21st Century

Robert Dahl, On Democracy

John Dewey, The Public and its Problems

Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere

Trackbacks

Post a Comment

We love comments but please be civil, OK? No ad hominem attacks, vulgarity, slander, libel, etc. Read our full policy.

Want a photo next to your name? Just sign up for a free Gravatar account and use that e-mail address when commenting.