Want Some Credit Card Reform? You Got It.


The House and Senate recently passed a bill that will change the way credit card companies are allowed to conduct business. This bill was passed on the heels of the second worst financial crisis to hit the United States in the last century. These new provisions will help to protect cardholders from practices currently being used by credit card companies that lawmakers feel to be predatory or unfair.

One of the major changes will be to make credit card statements easier to read and understand. Obama was recently quoted as saying, “You shouldn’t need a magnifying glass or a law degree to read the fine print that sometimes doesn’t even appear to be written in English.” More often than not, included in the fine print of these statements are details outlining the credit card companies’ rights to increase interest rates, or charge consumers penalties based on late payments, etc. The manner in which this information is presented makes it hard to find and comprehend.

Additionally, credit card companies will no longer be able to raise interest rates on existing balances until the card holder is 60 days delinquent. If a cardholder does have their interest rate raised due to delinquency, they have the ability to have it set back to its original level after 6 months of timely payments.

In one of the more alarming practices that will no longer be used, credit card companies will not be able to penelize a cardholder if their payment is considered late due to the credit card companies’ inability to process the payment on time. Meaning, in the past, if you got your payment to the company in time, but they were slow to process, you would be hit with a late fee. Along the same lines, cardholders will no longer be charged a late fee if their due date for payment falls on a weekend or holiday, and the credit card company doesn’t receive the payment until the day after. From now on, all due dates will be on non-holiday weekdays.

Lastly, no one under the age of 21 will be able to sign up for a credit card without having their legal guardian sign on as the primary cardholder.

As to be expected, the banking industry has big problems with the bill. Revenue created from late-fees and interest rate fluctuations comprise 10% of the credit card industry’s revenue. As a result, credit card companies say they will be forced to offer less credit at higher rates. This will cut the amount of credit and spending power available to the public which becomes a concern when the American economy depends so heavily on its citizens spending habits to stay healthy.  Also, cuts in credit could hurt small businesses as they rely on credit to stay operational when cash flows are low. It is very possible that the decrease in the amount of credit available could hurt the recovery of the economy.

Credit card companies have also threatened to cut reward programs due to expected decreases in revenue.

What do you think? Are these kinds of reforms long overdue? Have we been taken advantage of for too long, and have these credit card companies gotten rich at our expense long enough? Is it smart to decrease the amount of available credit to small businesses and struggling families especially during the current downturn? Will these provisions help delay our eventual economic recovery? At age 18, you can vote and die for your country, shouldn’t you be able to get some credit to pay for that sweet trick-bike you saw on ebay late Tuesday night when you couldn’t sleep after eating that double fudge sundae, without having to call your mom and ask her to be a cosigner?

That’s for you to decide. Actually, not really, in all likelihood Obama is going to pass the bill before Memorial day.

[Photo by Andres Rueda via Flickr and Creative Commons 2.0]

7 Comments  

Fayetteville Flyer doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

  1. Total Bastard says:

    Let me say firstly that I prefer a buyer-be-ware approach to most everything except that which could cause immediate bodily harm or death such as food and drugs.

    On the other hand, I understand that not everyone is as intelligent as I am and I also despise usury for the most part. Its pretty apparent to me that unsecured credit lending is one of the least regulated industries in this country.

    I think this legislation is a positive and that its long overdue. The restrictions and provisions appear to be mostly common sensical in nature and simply seek to reduce or remove the predatory pitfalls of unsecured credit.

    It could potentially make things a little less easy for people with awesome FICOs like myself via annual fees, etc, but its ok. A lot of people wind up screwed for several years for credit card decisions they make when they are 18-19 years old, and I don’t like people getting rich who prey on the young and stupid.

  2. Me says:

    Well, I was going to give my two cents, but Total Bastard just posted exactly what I would have said. I guess that makes me a Complete Bastard.

  3. Total Bastard says:

    Sorry to steal your thunder, Me. Its just what I do and who I am.

  4. OhDannyBoy says:

    Can we just focus on the more important ammendments to this bill? Guns are going to be allowed in national parks. All I can say is…about time!

  5. eLwood says:

    More guns! Did someone say more opportunity for more guns in public places.

    EULA MAE, get my .50 cal revolver out and give it a good cleaning.
    We’re headed for Yellowstone! I want the crotch holster with it too.
    Need to keep that baby nice and warm, slighly moist for perfect action.
    Just point me towards a Yellowstone perp and watch that sumbitch melt.
    Oh, the love of a http://www.popularmechanics.com/outdoors/sports/1277336.htmlwarm gun.

  6. eLwood says:

    well try it this way, clik on elwood.

  7. kirby sanders says:

    Sorry, eLwood –

    If you want something actively useful, the 50-cal (pistol) is too slow on the projectile delivery and too big a slug beyond 50 yards. No finesse. Just a .45 auto with an ego.

    CZ-52 and Tokarev in 7.62×25 will penetrate 3A Kevlar. Carry is extremely accurate to 200 yards, acceptable accuracy to 500 yards. Not bad for a pistol.

    50-cal pistoles don’t make holes at anything but short range — they just break ribs or cause bruises when you hit kevlar.

    If we’re talking about hunting (animals) in National Forests, the law being considered only addresses concealed carry pistoles. It has nothing to do with using your 30-30 to bring down a deer on federal land. That would still be restricted.

Comments are now closed for this article.

Archives · Contact Us