The Fayetteville City Council on Tuesday voted unanimously to pass a resolution reaffirming the city’s commitment to protecting transgender people.
The proposal was first announced last week by City Attorney Kit Williams, who said he felt compelled to do something after the Arkansas Legislature recently passed several bills that appear to have limited the rights of transgender people.
“The bills have probably caused considerable concern to our transgender citizens, their families, neighbors, friends and supporters,” Williams told council members last week.
Reaffirming Fayetteville’s Welcoming of all Persons
A resolution to affirm the City of Fayetteville’s commitment to diversity, inclusion, and protection of our transgender citizens, residents, and visitors.
Williams said while the city can’t stop the state from adopting its own new laws, the measures are in direct contrast to what Fayetteville voters showed at the polls in 2015 when they passed the city’s Uniform Civil Rights Protection ordinance in a special election.
That law was immediately challenged and upheld in circuit court, but then was appealed by Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge and eventually defeated.
“We can’t stop state laws,” said Williams. “But I thought it was important for my hometown and its leadership to state without any qualification that we believe in diversity and inclusion of all persons in our city.”
One recently passed state measure prohibits physicians from providing gender-affirming treatment for trans people under age 18. It’s the first law of its kind in the United States. Gov. Asa Hutchinson vetoed the bill, but the state’s General Assembly voted to override the veto.
Another new bill bans transgender student athletes from joining female sports teams. Gov. Hutchinson signed that bill in support. Arkansas was only the second state to pass such a measure. Mississippi adopted a similar bill in February.
A third new law allows doctors to deny nonemergency treatment to anyone if they have a moral or religious objection.
The laws were quickly denounced locally, and included statements from Molly Rawn, CEO of the city’s tourism bureau Experience Fayetteville, and Walmart heir Tom Walton, who serves as chair of the Walton Family Foundation’s Home Region Program Committee.
“In an already challenging year for tourism, this will only continue to negatively impact our industry, the state’s second largest economy,” said Molly Rawn, CEO of Experience Fayetteville. “More importantly, these laws will further marginalize the transgender community.”
Walton called the measures harmful and said they send the wrong message to those willing to invest in or visit Arkansas.
“Our nation was built on inalienable rights and strengthened by individual differences,” Walton said. “Arkansas has been called the land of opportunity because it is a place where anyone can think big and achieve the extraordinary. Any policy that limits individual opportunity also limits our state’s potential.”
City Council comments
During Tuesday’s meeting, most council members said they were in full support and asked to also be added as co-sponsors of the resolution on the city’s records.
Council Member Teresa Turk was first to speak and said diversity and inclusion is foremost in Fayetteville in order to maintain the culture of the city. Council Member Kinion agreed, and said the city has a heritage of welcoming everyone, and that should be enhanced and preserved.
Council Member D’Andre Jones said Fayetteville has been voted as one of the best places to live in the country and a large part of that is the city’s inclusive and equitable nature.
Council Member Holly Hertzberg said she supports the resolution, but can’t denounce the recently passed legislation. She read the following statement:
“I’m not willing to rebuke the recently passed state laws. I believe we can simultaneously support inclusion and common sense. I’m going to stay in my lane of healthcare and address the Arkansas Save Adolescents From Experimentation Act and the Medical Ethics and Diversity Act. With respect to the Save Act, I support the prohibition of gender transition procedures for minors. Deeply imbedded in our jurisprudence is the notion of protecting children. Minor are unable to purchase alcohol or tobacco, gamble and they aren’t considered to have the full legal capacity of an adult, so they aren’t able to vote, own property, sue or be sued or in many cases consent to medical treatment. Why don’t we allow children to participate in these activities as a society? Because we’re protecting children who aren’t considered capable of handing the same information as mature adults and who cannot yet provide necessary informed consent. If we discriminate based on age for any of these factors, why would that same logic not apply to the experimental, often times irreversible treatment of gender dysphoria? I am not at all questioning the rights to such treatment for individuals over the age of 18. I’m simply stating that there’s a difference between a 13-year-old requesting gender transition procecures and a 19-year-old making the decision for themself. Regarding the Medical Ethics and Diversity Act, I support the healthcare professional’s right to refuse treatment based on religious or moral objection. I believe we can simultaneously support civil rights and religious freedom, and as long as treatment is available from alternative providers, then the conscientious objections of a single practitioner should not be accorded less merit than that of a patient. With that said, I will be voting for this resolution because I believe every word. I too believe that Fayetteville should be a welcoming, accepting, and safe community for every group and individual.”
Council Member Sloan Scroggin, who is a math instructor at the university, said he has taught Democrats, Republicans, people of different races, sexual orientations and trans individuals. He said anyone who would refuse to teach a person for any of those reasons should quit teaching, and he believes the same thing about people in the medical field.
Mayor Lioneld Jordan said the recently passed laws prohibit cities from passing ordinances that protect the health and safety of its own people, and are clear discrimination against a class of people.
“They have attacked our ability to locally control our city,” said Jordan. “I think that’s wrong.”
He told the council the state’s decisions are the wrong laws in the wrong place, and they send the wrong message. But the resolution before the council, he said, is the right message in the right place at the right time.
“You don’t always have to stand tall, but you do need to stand up and let your voice be heard,” said Jordan. “And that’s what we’re doing tonight. We’re standing up for what is right.”